Upon reviewing the Ryzen 7 5700, it appears that we have encountered a product that may be considered deceptive, or at the very least, not in the best interest of consumers. However, it is possible that we are overreacting, so we invite you to form your own opinion. This processor is part of the “new” AM4 lineup that AMD has recently introduced, although it is essentially not new at all, but rather previously binned silicon packaged as a new product. We must acknowledge that AMD has surprised us with this release.
We were thrilled to discover the upcoming launch of the Ryzen 7 5700, particularly considering the 5700X stands out as one of the most cost-effective CPUs on the market currently, particularly for those who own AM4 motherboards. With prices starting as low as, it offers exceptional value for a highly capable 8-core / 16-thread processor.
We were delighted to find out about the imminent release of the Ryzen 7 5700, especially given that the 5700X is considered one of the most budget-friendly CPUs currently available, especially for AM4 users. Priced at just, it offers remarkable value for a relatively powerful 8-core / 16-thread processor.
Our original hypothesis was that the 5700 would be a slightly scaled-down iteration of the 5700X, with a reduction of 100-200 MHz and a price point of or lower. Nevertheless, as the adage goes, assumptions proved to be accurate.
This particular model went unnoticed because it was only available as an OEM component, making it impossible for us to acquire it separately without buying a whole system, something we might have considered if it hadn’t been restricted to Japan. AMD successfully introduced this chip without us noticing, and it’s regrettable because the 3500 is a product that is quite deceptive. The significant reduction in L3 cache has a considerable impact on performance, particularly for gaming.
Transitioning to the Ryzen 5000 series, in general, everything is in order. The non-X versions like the Ryzen 5 5600 mirror their X counterparts, except for a slight 200 MHz decrease in clock speed, leading to a minimal performance decrease. Consequently, the majority chose the 5600 instead of the 5600X.
Releasing a 5700G chip without integrated graphics is acceptable, but it should be labeled as the 5700F or 5700GF instead of simply the 5700, as this could lead to confusion. AMD initially sold the 5700 in the OEM market and announced retail availability in December, despite planning to do so since April 2022.
We have confirmed that the Ryzen 5700 and Ryzen 5700X are distinct products, despite their similar names. Now, let’s evaluate the performance of the 5700. In order to do so, we have carried out a set of gaming benchmarks, which we will summarize before delving into the 12-game average. Without giving too much away, it is worth noting that this chip is essentially a 5700G with the integrated GPU turned off.
What We Learned.
Here is the latest anti-consumer product from AMD. What are your thoughts on this matter? Some may argue that the Ryzen 5700’s value justifies the misleading naming. The 5700 is priced 15% lower than the 5700X in the US, and we discovered that it is, on average, 14% slower in gaming performance, or 16% slower when comparing 1% lows.
From that perspective, the value is decent, even though it lacks support for PCIe 4.0, which could pose issues depending on the GPU being utilized. The Ryzen 5700 is considered a good value, given the current pricing on Newegg. Nevertheless, the Ryzen 5700X, which is faster, has been available for as low as in recent months, indicating that it’s not a completely new price range.
The primary concern lies in the discrepancy between the product’s name and the actual performance it delivers. After consulting with knowledgeable individuals in the industry familiar with these products, it was widely believed that a Ryzen 7 5700 would be a slightly lower-tier model compared to the 5700X. Surprisingly, some of these individuals were considering selling the 5700 due to this misconception.
We purchased the 5700 based on the same assumption, despite the fact that the part has been available for years as an OEM-only model. It wasn’t until recently that we became aware of its existence when we were able to make a purchase.
We must confess that we didn’t pay much attention to its specifics at the moment of purchase; our decision was solely based on our anticipation of your interest. However, if we were to speculate, we would assume it to be a comparable offering to the Ryzen 5600 and 5600X, given AMD’s consistent pattern with their Ryzen series over the past 7 years.
If AMD had chosen a more fitting name for this product, like the 5700GF, we believe it could have been a satisfactory product at a reasonable price point. However, the current naming is too consumer-unfriendly for our taste, and we suggest steering clear of it. The Ryzen 5600, on the other hand, is a superior gaming CPU that comes at a lower cost. It has been established for quite some time that cache holds more importance than cores in gaming, within certain limits.